|
This is RSFCO
|
 |
|
|
|
|
News 2002 - part 2
| JULY 2 |
THE ROLLING STONES
40 X 20
FORTIETH ANNIVERSARY EXHIBITION
Govinda Gallery is pleased to announce a major exhibition of photographs celebrating
the fortieth anniversary of the Rolling Stones. Organized to
coincide with The Stones fortieth anniversary tour, this exhibition
features a selection of exceptional photographs documenting one of the
most influential and enduring musical groups of the twentieth century.
Beginning with Gus Coral¹s photographs of the Rolling Stones¹ first
tour of England, 40 X 20 traces the band¹s development through such key
periods as Gered Mankowitz¹s Between the Buttons photographs, Michael
Cooper¹s Satanic Majesties era images, Michael Joseph¹s Beggar¹s
Banquet session, and Dominique Tarle¹s photographs of their work in the
south of France recording Exile on Main Street.
Along with Fernando Aceves, William Coupon, Barry Feinstein, Claude
Gassian, Bob Gruen, Art Kane, Eddie Kramer, Chris Makos, Jan Olofsson,
Michael Putland, Ethan Russell, Mark Seliger, Dick Waterman, and Baron
Wolman¹s extraordinary photographs, this exhibition comprises a
stunning look at what many consider to be the greatest of rock &
roll bands.
The Rolling Stones: 40 X 20 opens September 20 and continues through
October 26, 2002.
For more information or interviews, please contact:
Chris Murray or Gabby Fisher, Phone 202-333-1180
+ Fax 202-625-0440
Govinda Gallery
1227 Thirty Fourth Street NW
Washington DC 20007 www.govindagallery.com |
| JULY 17 |
THE ROLLING STONES came during the last weekend to Toronto in Canada,
the first few days to relax and have some vacations and then to start
the rehearsals for their World Tour 2002/03, still without a certain
name.
Read a story here
from The Star in Toronto |
| JULY 19 |
The Rolling Stones are deeply saddened by the loss of Royden "Chuch"
Magee, who was the Head Crew Chief for the Rolling Stones. He took ill
during rehearsals last night in Toronto displaying symptons of a heart
attack. He was treated on site by paramedics and members of the fire
department and was taken to Sunnybrook hospital where he was pronounced
dead on arrival. "Chuch" 54 years old worked with the Rolling
Stones for 30 years.

Stones aide dies
Guitar technician collapses during band's North York rehearsal
By IAN ROBERTSON, PHILIP LEE-SHANOK AND JACK BOLAND,
TORONTO SUN
The Rolling Stones' rehearsal at North York's heavily guarded Crescent
School came to an abrupt halt last night when a crew member suffered a
fatal heart attack.
The man, identified as Roydon McGee, was taken by ambulance to
Sunnybrook hospital at 10 p.m.
SHAKEN
He was pronounced dead upon arrival, a tour staffer said at the
hospital, before declining further comment and joining another colleague.
Both were obviously shaken.
McGee, a guitar technician for the Stones, collapsed during the band's
final set of the evening.
Paramedics received a 911 call from the school at 9:25 p.m., and found a
Stones' medical aide "already working on him," performing
cardio-pulminary resuscitation, a Toronto Ambulance source told The
Toronto Sun. The staffer's vital signs were already absent when the crew
arrived.
The Stones' evening rehearsal began around 5 p.m., after guitarist Ron
Wood and frontman Mick Jagger were whisked into the school on Bayview
Ave., near Lawrence Ave.
Wood came through first in a white limo with Jagger following 10 minutes
later. Jagger shunned the fans and media, putting his fingers up in
front of his face and mouthing "no" to outstretched hands.
WAITED ALL DAY
John Brent, a Grade 10 student at the private school, waited all day
through downpours of rain to catch a glimpse of the aging rock stars.
"My mom gave me an album (Goat's Head Soup) and asked me to try an
get an autograph from one of them," said Brent. "I play guitar
and would like to jam with them since they're using my school."
The Stones have set up a session studio in Crescent as they prepare for
their upcoming tour, which kicks off Sept. 3 in Boston
On Oct. 16, the band will be back in Toronto, to play the Air Canada
Centre, then at SkyDome two days later.
"We have a small recording studio there, a large music room and our
auditorium -- Hyland Hall," Brent said. |
| AUG 7 |
These passes will be on ebay next week they are all extremely rare!!!







|
| AUG 15 |
SMALL NEWS AND BIGGER NEWS
SOLOMON BURKE will open the LA shows in
November. His famous song "Everybody Needs Somebody To Love"
was covered by the Stones. He also wrote songs like "Cry To
Me" and the lovely track "If You Need Me".
LONDON, AUGUST 12 2002 from Rolling Stones website: The first ever
comprehensive retrospective album covering The Rolling Stones' greatest
hits dating back to the very start of the band's recording career up to
the present day will be released worldwide by EMI Recorded Music's
Virgin Records label on October 1, 2002 in North America (September 30
outside North America and September 23 in Japan).
Entitled Forty Licks, the package consists of two 20-track
CDs (CD1 on the ABKCO label and CD2 on the Virgin label) that represent
an unprecedented joint cooperative venture between The Rolling Stones,
ABKCO Records and EMI's Virgin Records in North America, and between The
Rolling Stones, ABKCO, Universal Music International and EMI in the rest
of the world.
Destined to confirm to both long time and new fans why the Rolling
Stones have been acknowledged as 'The World's Greatest Rock 'n Roll
Band,' the collection features digitally remastered classic Rolling
Stones hits including (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction, Ruby Tuesday,
Brown Sugar, Miss You and Start Me Up.
In addition to these historic tracks that reflect the Stones legacy,
four new songs especially recorded by the band for this collection with
producer Don Was are included in the set.
The Rolling Stones will kick off their Rolling Stones World Tour
2002/2003 in Boston on September 3rd. After over 40 dates in North
America the band will head off to Europe, Australia and Asia where, in
2003, they hope to play their first ever concerts in China. Artists that
will share the stage with The Rolling Stones as opening acts on the tour
include No Doubt, the Pretenders, Sheryl Crow, Buddy Guy and Jonny Lang.
The Rolling Stones hold the all-time records for the three best attended
tours of all time - 'Steel Wheels', 'Voodoo Lounge' and 'Bridges to
Babylon'
NEWS FOR THE NEXT DAYS - Blue Lena will send all news to the
board for the next days, as Charlotte is on vacation and joining the
STONES GATHERING PARTY on the roof of the Alps. Report will come in
STONES PLANET NO. 10.
|
| AUG 27 |
Pop Memorabilia sale - 3 October, Christie's London
at 10.30AM
Contact: Helen Bailey 0207 321 3280 hbailey@christies.com
Lot 53
A rare early concert flyer All Nite Rave, Midnight to 6a.m....Sat.,
December 21st, DUSTY SPRINGFIELD & THE ECHOES, Sat.,
December 28th, THE
ROLLING STONES... and others, Club Noreik, Tottenham, London,
1963
£400-600
click for enlargement of photo |

|
Lot 52
A rare early publishing contract for the song Stoned, October
11th, 1963,
the printed contract completed with carbon typescript details
between
Southern Music Publishing Company Ltd and Michael Jagger with
Brian Jones,
Charles Watts, William Perks, Keith Richards and Ian Stewart...
giving their
joint pseudonym - "Nanker Phelge", the composer
section of the contract
signed in blue ballpoint pen Brian Jones, Keith Richards, Mick
Jagger, Ian Stewart, W.Perks [Bill Wyman], Ian Stewart and
Charlie Watts
£7,000-8,000
click for enlargement of photo.
|
 |
|
| SEP 9 |
Many asked how the stage looked like - see it here
. The stage are delivered from Stage-Co in Belgium
|
| SEP 9 |
They just can't get no separation
from Reuters:
London - Four decades into their relationship as rock's most enduring - and
acrimonious - musical partnership, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards say they are
forever inseparable.
The Rolling Stones' outrageous frontman and hard-living guitarist told the Times
newspaper on Friday that too much is vested in their love-hate relationship to
let it fall apart.
"I don't know if it's some sort of inner competition, maybe that's the
chemistry that keeps us going," Richards was quoted as saying.
"The fact is we're totally different people, but we're attracted to each
other at the same time, and there's also the recognition that we can't get
divorced."
Jagger and Richards first met more than 50 years ago as young schoolboys, but it
wasn't until they were students at the London School of Economics that their
friendship blossomed.
In 1962 they founded the Rolling Stones, and amid the drugs, women, money and
worldwide success, cultivated a volatile relationship that frequently threatened
to fall apart.
Richards has publicly ridiculed Jagger's ego and poorly received solo musical
efforts. Earlier this month, he sneered at the singer's recent knighthood,
calling it a "paltry honour".
"He's got a big mouth," Jagger told the Times. "He likes to make
out he's still a very rebellious 59-year-old. That's all right, that's the role
you play.
"We have a pretty good working relationship. If he needs covering, I'll
cover for him and if he needs to cover for me, he will."
As the Stones prepare to launch their first world tour in three years, starting
on September 3 in Boston, the pair reject criticism they are a quartet of
wrinkly rockers who don't know when to exchange the stage for the rocking chair.
"I think we just want to see how far it can go," Richards said. "There's
a great feeling in the band that we ain't really found all that the Rolling
Stones can do yet."
|
| SEP 10 |
By SARAH RODMAN
BOSTON HERALD
The Rolling Stones kick off their ``Licks'' tour tomorrow night at the
FleetCenter. In interviews last week with the Herald, Keith Richards and Mick
Jagger reflected on last year's Concert for New York City, Jagger's knighting
by the Queen of England and their recently released CD reissues and upcoming
``40 Licks'' compilation album.
Q. You were recently knighted by the queen, how was that experience?
A. ``I think it's very nice but it's something you should wear very lightly,''
said Sir Mick. ``You should learn to accept compliments, I think, gracefully,
but that doesn't mean to say that that makes you swollen-headed or put on airs
and graces.''
Q. Do you get any perks like a lifetime supply of tea or anything?
A. ``No,'' he said with a laugh. ``You don't get anything really. You get
abuse from lots of people.''
Q. Your bandmates had some choice words for you. How do you react to their
abuse?
A. ``With scorn normally,'' Jagger said.
Richards said of the knighthood, with a devilish cackle, ``I deflated that
immediately. We have other names for him apart from sir.''
Q. The new greatest hits album ``40 Licks,'' due out Oct. 1, has four new
tracks on it. The first single ``Don't Stop'' is classic Stones with you
singing about a dangerous but irresistible woman over a dirty guitar riff.
Tell me about the other three tunes.
A. ``There's one called `Stealing My Heart' which is a bit more of a
garage-y tune,'' Jagger said, ``and there's `Keys to Your Love' which is more
kind of a soul tune and Keith sings a slow ballad called `Losing My Touch.' ''
Q. Is that a commentary on his skills?
A. ``You better ask Keith,'' said Jagger with a laugh.
Q. What did you think of the recent ABKCO reissues of the early Stones
albums?
A. ``I was amazed,'' Richards said. ``When I heard these new mixes and new
mastering, I was hearing little things that we put in there that you can't
really hear on the originals so they've actually enhanced them. This is
amazing stuff because some of that stuff is 40 years old and tape doesn't last
forever. But they managed to pull it out and from that point of view I was
very impressed by the system, it was another leap in audio excellence.''
Q. When you look out into your audiences you must see people of all ages.
That must give you some satisfaction.
A. ``I love it that people pick up the Stones at different times and
different places and not everyone goes back to the year dot,'' said Jagger. ``It's
very gratifying. I love it.''
``Sometimes it's weird,'' Richards said. ``You walk out there and you see
three, four generations and there's people with their grandkids and like some
of these kids from the last tour who were 12 then are now 17 and a couple of
them send me letters saying they're in bands now, making records, yeah,'' said
Richards with a rheumy laugh. ``They're my apprentices, you know.''
Q. You played your ode to the blue-collar working man, ``Salt of the
Earth,'' last year at the Concert For New York City, I thought that was very
touching.
A. ``Thank you. Mick and I were wondering what songs to play,'' Richards
said. ``And Mick said, `Oh, how perfect would it be for `Salt of the Earth'
and I said, `I can't think of a better one, Mick.' It seemed like it was
written for the occasion.''
Q. How was that experience, was it sad, celebratory, both?
A. ``It was both really. Even more than that. Over my years living in New
York I know a lot of those guys. Cops and firemen, they're some of our biggest
fans,'' Richards said. ``If I'm walking in New York City and it's . . . (raining),
I've often been picked up by the cops. They say, `Hey, Keith, wanna lift?' ''
Richards said with a laugh. ``I love New York, and New York loves me.''
Q. You don't have a show scheduled for Sept. 11. What will you do that day?
A. ``I don't have any plans for that day,'' said Jagger, who was invited to
a baseball game. ``I'll see what Chicago brings.''
``Everybody's just going to sit quiet and remember,'' Richards said.
Q. Considering your history, what do you say to your kids about drugs?
A. ``Kids will be kids. I say, `Just don't let me catch you at it because
mother will give me a good hiding,' '' Richards laughed. He added more
seriously, ``They ask me about it because they know they can talk to me about
it and I always say, `Do as I say, don't do as I did,' and I give them a few
good reasons why not. But they're smarter than that, their mother raised them
right.''
Q. I'm sure you've heard all the jokes about your appearance and the nature
of your longevity. Do such comments as ``the walking dead'' hurt your
feelings?
A. ``Not really,'' Richards said. ``I set myself up for it in a way and I'm
actually quite proud of it because I'm still here. I know what I'm doing. What
I find funny is that other people think I don't. Nobody knows me except me.''
Q. So the only thing to survive a nuclear war would be Keith Richards and
the cockroaches?
A. ``Oh yeah. And God help the roaches.''
|
|
SEP 18 |
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN
The Rolling Stones have agreed to give their first live concert for an
American television network, a show that will air on HBO in January. The pay
cable network will present the Stones at Madison Square Garden in New
York on Jan. 18, 2003, one of the last stops on their ``Licks'' tour.
|
|
SEP 18
|
FORTUNE Exclusive:
Inside the Business of the Rolling Stones
Story Reveals Why Stones Keep Touring--and How They Make More
Money Than Any Other Band
Tuesday September 17, 11:05 am ET
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 17, 2002--What CEO of a large, multinational
company can swivel-hip his way through "Midnight Rambler?" The
Rolling Stones' Mick Jagger, that's who.
And though some may think he's getting a trifle old to rock and roll--he'll
turn 60 next July--from a business perspective Jagger and the Stones are at
the top of their game. The band, far and away the most successful act in rock
and roll today, is a thriving enterprise--"a combustible mix of talent
and intense labor," writes FORTUNE editor-at-large Andy Serwer in
"Inside the Rolling Stones, Inc.," an in-depth look at how the band
dominates the business of rock and roll. The story appears in the September 30
issue of FORTUNE, available on newsstands September 23 and at www.fortune.com
on September 15..
Since 1989, the
Rolling Stones have generated more than $1 billion in gross revenues, a total
which includes record sales, song rights, merchandising, sponsorship money and
touring. The Stones have made more money than U2, Bruce Springsteen, Michael
Jackson or the Who--more than any band, with the possible exception of the
Beatles. And unlike some groups, says Serwer, the Stones carry no "Woodstock-esque,
anti-business baggage." Instead, they have deep roots in American business,
cutting deals with Anheuser-Busch, Microsoft, and Sprint. And like many other
large businesses, the band is global, pays taxes--grudgingly--and litigates.
"Spend time with the band's senior entourage and you quickly realize how
the Stones got so market-wise," says Serwer. Though Mick Jagger attended
the London School of Economics, "his greatest talent, besides strutting and
singing, is his ability to surround himself and the band with a group of very
able executives."
The Rolling Stones, reports Serwer, are a private and secretive organization,
and many of their executives, such as chief financial officer Joe Rascoff, tour
manager Michael Cohl, and Prince Rupert Lowenstein, a London-based banker who
has been the band's business advisor for over 30 years, stay out of the public
eye. But they are crucial when it comes to "interlocking" the various
businesses linked to the band: touring, merchandising, publishing rights, etc.
They oversee a group of four companies--based in the Netherlands, which has a
more favorable tax code than the U.K.--each dedicated to a particular side of
the business. Touring,
which today is totally professionalized, complete with immigration lawyers, a
staff of travelling accountants, and real-time budgets, is the biggest
money-making part of the Stones' operation. Since the 1989 Steel Wheels
tour--when Cohl took over managing the band's shows--the Stones have grossed
over $750 million on the road. Though exact profit margins are hard to come by,
it's safe to say that tens of millions of that total flowed directly to the band
members, according to Serwer.
When Cohl took over, new streams of revenue were created by selling skyboxes,
bus tours, and TV deals, as well as through innovative merchandising. Cohl also
brought in corporate sponsors like Volkswagen and Sprint. Most importantly, he
stitched these operations together, through cross-promotion and the like, to
maximize their earnings power. The Steel Wheels tour itself made over $198
million, a record for a rock tour.
On the new Licks tour, which kicked off in Boston last week, the band will
play three types of venues: stadiums, arenas and small clubs, each with a unique
set of songs (they've rehearsed over 130 for this tour), staging and lights.
Revenues from Licks won't approach the monster Voodoo Lounge tour in 1994/1995,
which brought in close to $370 million, nor the 1997/1998/1999 Bridges to
Babylon tour, which did over $390 million. But merchandising will be more
sophisticated than ever, with about 50 items available.
But with tours only happening every few years, the steady profits--"the
Microsoft part of the Stones business empire," according to Serwer--come
from performing rights. The Stones have dozens of songs that are played on FM
radio, still a vibrant medium. And anytime a song is played--at a skating rink,
on a jukebox, at a club--the Jagger/Richards cash register goes "ca-ching,"
says Serwer. All this--the tours, the records, the rights--have made the Stones
the wealthiest rock band on the planet. Jagger alone is said to have a fortune
of some $500 million.
"So what keeps the Stones going?," asks Serwer. "Money, yes.
But the band could make big bucks simply by licensing commercials instead of
touring. Going on the road is about ego gratification." And when the Stones
stop touring, concludes Serwer, "it will mean not only the end of the
world's greatest rock band, but also a winding down of the most successful
enterprise this crazy business has ever known."
Complete interviews with Mick Jagger and Keith Richards will be available at www.fortune.com
, along with related features not found in the magazine.
|
|
SEP 20
|
Auction Sept. 24
66
Promotional poster for the Rolling Stones' film 'Gimme Shelter'
omotional poster for the Rolling Stones' film 'Gimme Shelter'
An original Swedish promotional black and white poster for the Rolling
Stones GIMME SHELTER 20th Century Fox film, a documentary of the Stones'
1969 tour, with much of the focus on the tragic free concert at Altamont
Speedway, east of Oakland in Northern California.
Measures approx. 12 x 27.5 inch (30 x 70 cm.)
£100-150
67
A guitar signed by the Rolling Stones
A black E-ROS 12 string acoustic guitar signed in silver marker pen Mick
Jagger, Charlie Boy, Keith Richards, Bill Wyman and on the scratchplate in
gold marker pen Mick Taylor.
£600-800
68
Rolling Stones' Rock and Roll Circus' poster
A large poster, produced by ABKO, to promote the 1996 release of Rolling
Stones Rock And Roll Circus December 11 1968 on CD and Video, mounted,
framed and glazed.
Overall measurement approx. 37 x 25 inch (94 x 65 cm)
£200-300
69
Autograph album, with various signatures including The Rolling Stones and
Brian Epstein
A pink autograph album, signed throughout by many British sixties stars, to
include; Billy J Kramer, Brian Epstein (The Beatles Manager), PJ Proby, Gene
Vincent, Davy Jones, and others. Together with loose, folded page signed and
annotated Love to Lee Bill Wyman, Keith Richard, Mick Jagger, Brian Jones and
Charlie Boy (Watts), all in different colour pens, dated Bournmouth 1964
in a different hand.
£600-800
70
Four Rolling Stones items
A copy of The Rolling Stones debut album Decca Mono LK 4605, (second
pressing sleeve lists Mona not I Need You Baby), together with a 1990 London
Records promotional Radio Sampler CD with 6 songs and two London Records
sales marketing sheets titled August 1988 is Rolling Stones Month with
illustrations of seventeen Rolling Stones album covers. (4)
Various sizes
71
Ronnie Woods signed items
Two pages, each featuring a black and white image of Ronnie, signed each in
gold pen with a doodle Ronnie Wood together with two flyers for a Japanese
exhibition of Wood's paintings. (4)
£60-80
89
The Beatles and Rolling Stones 'The Great Pop Prom' concert
programme, 1963
A rare programme for a concert held at the Royal Albert Hall, London on 15
September 1963, organised by teen magazine Valentine in aid of the Printers
Pension Corporation. The Stones opened the show and the Beatles closed it.
This was the first time both bands performed together.
Condition: Near mint.
£1,500-2,000
|
|
SEP 25
|
STOP PRESS * STOP PRESS * STOP PRESS * STOP
PRESS * STOP PRESS
Ronnie's brother, Art Wood, will be appearing at the famous Eel Pie Club in
Twickenham (situated at the Cabbage Patch, 67 London Road, Twickenham,
Middlesex) in a special night of the Art Wood All Stars - featuring some famous
names!! Art's original band The ArtWoods included Ronnie Wood and Rod Stewart
among the line up. This special event will be on Wednesday 2 October at 9.00pm (doors
open 8.30pm). Admisson for members £5-00 and non-members £7-00. Should be a
very interesting night. Further details on Web Page: www.eelpieclub.com
Art Wood will also be appearing at the annual R&B celebration concert -
Richmond Rhythm & Blues 2002 on Sat 2 November at York House, Twickenham.
Others appearing will be The Downliners Sect, Zoot Money, Pete French (one of
the great rock singers from Automic Rooster and Cactus) plus a host of celebrity
guests.
Tickets in advance £17-50 (on the night £20-00). Contact the Museum of
Richmond for advance tickets - telephone 0208 332 1141. Further information
contact:
Ticket Hot Line on 07729 176130.
|
|
SEP 26
|
PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER
Once more, with feeling
"This is crazy," guitarist Keith Richards
admits about the Rolling Stones' new approach to touring. Three shows here
will let Philadelphia fans decide for themselves.
By Tom Moon
Inquirer Music Critic
 |
|
 |
| Keith Richards (right) says the
Stones, including Mick Jagger (left) and Ron Wood, are 'firing
hotter.' |
|
It's the end of another 10-hour day of rehearsals for the Rolling Stones, and
Keith Richards is having his doubts. He's worried that the world's most famous
rock-and-roll band - whose concert at Veterans Stadium tonight will be the first
of three area performances in five days - has finally bitten off more than it
can chew.
For several months, he and songwriting partner Mick Jagger have pored over 40
years of music-making, preparing for a tour that requires them to put on
different shows depending on whether they're in stadiums, arenas or theaters.
They've worked up around 130 songs they've rarely played live to complement the
crowd-pleasers the Stones have done more or less on autopilot since the '70s.
For musicians whose average age is 58, and whose last several tours have been
scripted down to the last spotlight cue, this qualifies as a risky proposition.
Even with TelePrompTers.
"So I'm standing around at rehearsal," Richards says by phone from
Boston, his voice a tad more animated than its usual gravelly growl. "And
there's this big canvas board where Ronnie has written down all the songs.
"I'm looking at it going, 'What are we studying for, Mr. Memory of the
Universe? At our age?' This is crazy."
Then Richards drops into a whisper. "Strange thing, though. Even with a
song I hadn't played in 20 years, if I didn't think about it and just started,
my fingers knew where to go. Right away, like it was automatic... . Comes down
to something very simple: Don't think, just feel."
Which, of course, has always been the Rolling Stones' credo, and one reason
this band of jazzheads and blueshounds still merits attention.
Its core musicians - Jagger and guitarist Richards, both 59, drummer Charlie
Watts, 61, and guitarist Ron Wood, 55, who get tour assistance from keyboardist
Chuck Leavell, bassist Darryl Jones, a horn section and background singers -
hail from the golden age when feeling mattered more than the twisted
intellectual constructs that choke the music now.
The Stones bear some responsibility for the level of contrivance associated
with contemporary pop - they are, after all, the fathers of stadium-size
spectacle. But they also have contributed their share of anarchy. And there
remains the chance - OK, just a glimmer - that on some starry night the Rolling
Stones will tear up the script and flatten everyone within earshot. So we stand
in line, spend crazy money for tickets, and do things we wouldn't do for any
other reunion tour.
If late-in-the-game greatness is even a remote possibility, it's largely
because of Richards, the rock iconoclast who elevated not giving a damn to an
art. Where Jagger obsesses over every ripple of his image, Richards is the same
heedless cat he's always been, a walking example of instinct over intellect. His
specialty is the pointillist rhythm-guitar riff, and for an incredibly long
time, he has supplied the world with two-bar motifs that distill rock to its
rebellious essence. The chordal blasts he has lodged into the cultural memory -
not just "Satisfaction," his War and Peace, but "Brown
Sugar," "Jumpin' Jack Flash," "Street Fightin' Man,"
the list goes on - are expressions of angst and anger and rollicking joy so
elemental (and universal) as to virtually define the emotional range of
rock-and-roll.
Richards takes little credit for them - "I've always trusted me
intuition, always listened to the voice inside" - and maintains that he
knows by feel whether a Rolling Stones song is any good.
"Look, this music has been with us since the caves," he says with a
chuckle. "It's very ancient music, a beautiful reaffirmation of melody and
rhythm."
And he proudly notes that the Stones are big in places such as Indonesia:
"If you can sell a song there, where people have no idea what you're
talking about, that tells you what you're doing is beyond language."
As Richards talks about preparations for the band's Licks Tour and looks back
over the Stones' astounding career, he sounds as if he's got something to atone
for. He regards the current sojourn, which will continue with sold-out shows at
the First Union Center on Friday and the Tower Theater Sunday, as a chance for
the band to shed the larger-than-life excess, and give back to diehard fans who
have suffered through greatest-hits show after greatest-hits show.
"I said it for years, and finally they listened to me: Playing in
smaller joints helps us do the bigger ones," Richards asserts. "There's
a lot of improvisation and adapting that goes on when you're just playing and
not doing the big stadium thing."
Richards describes his relationship with Jagger as "complicated."
He says he was dismayed when Jagger was knighted by Queen Elizabeth in June. He
felt it distanced the band from its scrappy roots. And he adds that he's been
able to endure only the first three tracks of Goddess in the Doorway, the
solo project Jagger released last fall.
But he's also got enormous affection for Jagger. "There's this amazing
spark of total opposites that we have, and, like many people, Mick has lots of
sides, not just the one he shows the world. I think we've proven now that yin
and yang can hang."
Richards believes that there's another reason the Stones are "firing
hotter than we ever have this early on": Ronnie Wood, who has had bouts
with substance abuse over the years, checked himself into alcohol rehab this
year.
"Who am I to talk?" Richards says, making reference to the cycle of
high living, dissolution, and paying the consequences that has defined his life.
"Ronnie was getting a bit out there, and to his credit he recognized it
himself. I've been amazed at his focus. He's really helping us forge this
immense machine."
Relearning old songs, and listening to newly remastered early works - all
recently rereleased on the Abkco label - has made Jagger and Richards realize
that there were many neglected gems in the Stones discography. The band is
performing "Slave" for the first time in 20 years, "Heart of
Stone" for the first time in 25 years, and "Can't You Hear Me Knocking"
and "She Smiles Sweetly" for the first time ever.
"What's weird about the record business is how sometimes you write a
song, and if it's any good, you record it... . Maybe you go on to the next hit
and forget about it. Meanwhile the song never stops growing. All this time
later, you bring it out and it can tell you something new. That's been amazing."
This tour marks the first one without an album of entirely new material to
plug. Initially, that troubled Richards greatly: The guitarist insisted that the
band at least try to write and record something, even if its efforts never saw
the light of day. Four tracks from sessions earlier this year appear on the
two-disc hits compilation Forty Licks, which will be released Oct. 1.
Richards explains that working on new music is the best way to get the
Rolling Stones revved up. "When we went into the studio, we hadn't played
in three years. Nobody knows the [new] song, so the playing ground is level.
There's a little bit of extra concentration, and no faking it. You start
sparking off each other, and pretty soon you have something that sounds like the
Rolling Stones."
He's asked whether it's harder to whip up something that sounds like the
Rolling Stones these days - if the band's age and status are insurmountable
hurdles. They certainly don't need to tour to send their grandkids to college.
Or to earn some special distinction in the record books.
So what motivates them to go through the trials of the road?
"You know, there are demons in me, 47 at last count, and the only time
they get out is when we're on stage," Richards says wryly.
So, when people see him perform, a man immersed in the work of tending a
groove, does that accurately reflect what is going on inside?
"You're feeding off the music and the audience at the same time. It's a
good exchange of adrenaline. Like I said before, you're not thinking. Then
you'll get to something like 'Jumpin' Jack Flash,' which is my litmus test.
"It's very tight to play, the band really has to become this one sound.
When it does, don't kid yourself: That's an addiction... . The riff is just
beautiful. It's just flying off your fingers, and everything's easy... .
"Pretty soon you realize you're 34 feet off the ground, levitating. It's
like going back to your youth. No, it's better than going back to your youth."
He stops to laugh, as though he's just divulged too much. "Then, of
course, the only thing you worry about is the landing."
|
|
SEP 26
|
GATHERING MOSS
By BILL HOFFMANN, NY POST
"I might sail around Long Island Sound if the weather is all
right," Keith Richards tells Rolling Stone mag.
- Rolling Stone
|
KEITH Richards has made a shocking confession that's going to jolt his
longtime fans: The party-animal rock star has turned into Mr. Suburban.
The Rolling Stones guitar great, who will soon turn 59, says many of his
great joys in life now revolve around his peaceful tree-lined neighborhood in
southern Connecticut.
His big chores of the day are driving his teenage daughters, Alexandra and
Theodora, to school and taking out the garbage.
"I have no fixed routine . . . I read a lot. I might have a little sail
around Long Island Sound if the weather is all right," Richards tells the
Oct. 17 issue of Rolling Stone mag.
"Patti [Hansen] and I go out go out once a week if there's something on
in town - take the old lady out for dinner with a bunch of flowers."
Instead of going to bed coked-up at 7 a.m., that's when he's getting up,
bright-eyed and bushy-tailed.
It's a night-and-day difference from the years when Richards did so many
drugs - speed, coke, acid, heroin, dope - that he had his blood cleansed.
Playing with the Stones tonight at Madison Square Garden as part of their
world tour, the grizzled rocker now sticks to vodka and cigarettes.
But he doesn't want anybody to think he's calming down - and he plans to play
with the Stones for as long as he physically can.
"You keep going, and why not? You're fighting upstream against this
preconception that you can't do this at this age," he tells the mag.
"But I don't flaunt it. I've never tried to stay up longer than anybody
else just to announce to the media that I'm the toughest."
When asked to describe the levels of drug excess he and Mick Jagger plummeted
into in the old days, Richards tells Rolling Stone: "He wasn't exactly Mr.
Clean and I was Mr. Dirty."
And he says although they're a great songwriting team, their current lives
couldn't be more different.
"Mick has to dictate to life. He wants to control it. To me, life is a
wild animal. You hope to deal with it when it leaps at you," Richards
explains. "[Mick] can't go to sleep without writing out what he's going to
do when he wakes up. I just hope to wake up, and it's not a disaster."
So now that he's a little over a year away from turning 60, just what is
Keith's secret to stayin' alive?
"If you want to live a long life, join the Rolling Stones," he
quips.
|
|
OCT. 1
|
Stones rule:
You're trying to pay attention to Mick Jagger singing
about the gin-soaked barroom queen in Memphis and the divorcee in New York City.
You really are.
But it's hard, because your eye keeps wandering up to the cartoon image of
the woman flickering on the screen over his head in Philadelphia's Veterans
Stadium.
Maybe it's because she's 20 feet tall. Maybe it's because she's sultry. Maybe
it's because she's wearing only high heels and a black brief as she rides up and
down on a long tongue that has snaked out from between two incandescent red
lips.
Ah, yes, the lips. If the lips are back, the Rolling Stones can't be far
behind, and even though a pair of seats will set you back a week's wages,
they're the town's hot ticket tomorrow at the Garden, Saturday at Giants Stadium
and, best of all, Monday at the intimate Roseland.
The way it works at Roseland is that, if you have extra tickets, someone will
hand you a blank check. The going rate yesterday was $3,000-$4,000 a seat.
This isn't bad for a band that half the world thinks shouldn't be playing at
all, that even some fans think hasn't made a great record in three decades and
whose best-selling albums have, in 30-plus years, rarely sold more than a couple
of million copies. The last Britney Spears CD, that many copies fell off the
delivery trucks.
Whether or not you think the Stones are the world's greatest rock 'n' roll
band - and in Philadelphia last week, they made their case - there's something
more here than marketing and mythology.
Beyond Altamont and the blood-transfusion lore and Keith Richards waking up
one morning to pluck the "Satisfaction" riff out of the passing air,
the Stones created a deep, wide and granite-solid foundation of music and songs
that are unlike anything else in the half-century history of rock.
Now, sure, all that music started somewhere else. It came from Jimmy Reed and
Muddy Waters and Bo Diddley and Chuck Berry and Buddy Holly and Scotty Moore and
a thousand others. It came from bluesman Robert Johnson, who before he died
young in 1938 recorded the bleak "Love in Vain."
Last Friday in Philly, the Stones played "Love in Vain," a
beautiful, aching rendition with Ron Wood on pedal-steel guitar.
Robert Johnson's songs aren't forgotten. But not many bands beyond the Stones
play them today in arenas and stadiums.
Nor do a lot of bands sing, "I'll bet your mama was a tent-show queen/And
all her boyfriends were sweet sixteen." Or "There will always
be a space in my parking lot/When you need a little Coke and sympathy."
What a line. Who else, anywhere?
This doesn't mean the Stones have a better repertoire than, say, Bob Dylan.
It just means that, for all the bad boys who have strutted across rock stages
over the years, none do it better than the Stones.
Posing? Of course. Mick and Keith are grandmasters of posing. In Philly, they
were doing a new song, "Don't Stop," on which Mick plays guitar, and
during a bridge he walked over to Keith, ready to fall into one of those
guitar-buddy moments.
Keith took a figurative step backward and gave Mick a look. "You're not
a guitar player," that look said. "I'm a guitar player."
It's theater, it's almost opera, and it works because it's riding such a
solid foundation of music - songs that dig out our nastiest, most evil
ruminations ("You're obsolete, my baby/My poor old-fashioned baby"),
our bleakest fears ("You can't always get what you want") and
yet somehow help us through the day instead of darkening it.
Someone who simply saw the set list from Veterans Stadium might shrug it off
as just another greatest-hits show, since the most casual fan could sing along
with 18 or 19 of the 21 songs.
But this wasn't the Beach Boys, bless their lovely harmonies. This wasn't a
freeze-dried moment from 1972. When Jagger and backup vocalist Lisa Fisher
exploded out of an ominous swirl of sound to sing "A storm is
threatening ... my very life today," it could have been written off the
morning papers.
The Stones have been following the raucous barroom workout "Tumblin'
Dice" with Richards singing "Slipping Away" so wistfully it's
reminiscent of Sinatra's "Angel Eyes." They've been singing Dylan's
"Like a Rolling Stone," not a definitive version, just sly and witty.
They do know how it feels to be a Rolling Stone.
"It's a wonderful night," Jagger said as he looked up at the
late-summer moon and down at the crowd.
He gets no argument here.
And, oh, by the way, the girl. She rode the tongue for a while, then the lips
swallowed her. A couple of beats later, they spit out a high heel.
|
|
OCT. 2
|
Change will protect Keith Richards' privacy
October 2, 2002 (LONDON) — A
local council in southern England said it has agreed to move a footpath from
which prying eyes could peer into the country home of Rolling Stones guitarist
Keith Richards.
The guitarist had complained that the path, popular
with weekend walkers, ran within 10 yards of his property in West Wittering,
allowing passers-by to see into the grounds.
West Sussex Council said Tuesday it has agreed to have the path moved to
the other side of a nearby field.
"Someone well-known is more vulnerable than you or me. We are well
aware of what the paparazzi do. We are well aware of what nutters can do,"
said Bill Acraman, chairman of the council's rights of way committee.
"Whether they be prime minister or pop star, they are more vulnerable
than you or I. I strongly feel we should be able to go the extra mile."
Richards, 58, bought the thatched seaside house 75 miles south of London as
a country retreat in 1966.
A spokesman for Richards, who is on tour in the United States with the
Rolling Stones, said he was not available for comment Tuesday.
Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
|
|
OCT 3
|
Jagger donates money to old school
LONDON (AP) -- Rolling Stone Mick Jagger hasn't forgotten who gave him
a good start -- he has donated 100,000 pounds (about $250,000 Cdn) to help
youngsters at his old school.
Dartford Grammar School in Kent county, southern England, said Monday that the
singer wants the money to be used for programs that will encourage children to
study music.
"I believe we should encourage children to sing and play instruments from
an early age," Jagger said from the United States, where the Rolling
Stones are on tour.
"I was really impressed with the facilities and the staff when I first
visited the centre and I hope that my contribution will help this great work
continue and allow even more children to experience the thrill of making their
own music.
"It is so important that they have somewhere like this where they can
share their musical ideas and vision and be able to practise for as long as
they like."
The school's music centre, which opened two years ago, is named Red Rooster
after the Rolling Stones' 1964 UK No. 1 hit, Little Red Rooster.
The money will help pay for a project director to develop music tuition at
kindergarten and primary school level and provide free local string and wind
instrument training, run in conjunction with Kent Music School and Trinity
College of Music.
The centre already has two state-of-the-art auditoriums, a 16-track
recording studio and several music practice rooms.
Rock and jazz music workshops as well as choir and orchestral performances are
held during school vacations.
Head teacher Tony Smith said the school is "deeply involved in the arts
within the community and with Mick Jagger's act of kindness we will be able to
change the lives of local children and adults.
"This project will fill a vacuum, making serious music opportunities
available at a very early stage of education and providing instruments free."
|
|
OCT 4
|
Stones Roll In to Town
Reported by Kristin Smith
Web produced by Kelly Reynolds
Ford Field will be rocking this weekend. That's
because the Stones are roll into town for a concert in downtown Detroit. It's
the first major concert to be held at the Lions new den.
One of the world's greatest rock bands performing at one of the world's
greatest stadiums. Semis rolled the Stones' stage and equipment into town.
Thirty-one production trucks, 22 steel hauling trucks, and more than 300
people all just trying to keep up with Mick and the boys.
Judging from the size of the stage and the spectacular sound system, Saturday
night's show will be larger than life.
"It's big. It's 200 feet wide, 85 feet tall and 86 foot deep," said
Jake Berry, Rolling Stones Production Director.
With a runway that leads to a second stage, where the Stones will perform at
least three songs up close and personal.
"So it's huge, but why is it so huge?" Channel 7's Kristin Smith
asked Berry.
"Have you ever known the Rolling Stones to do do anything small?"
Of course not. Mick and the band aim to please, and with floor seats priced as
high a $300, fans expect satisfaction.
While we're talking numbers, just how old are these guys anyway? Well, pushing
60, but the band's producer director likens the Stones to a bottle of red wine.
It gets better with age.
"The show is fantastic. And the energy level is still as high as it ever
was," Berry said.
Well, want to see for yourself? As of Friday night, more than 40,000 seats
have been sold, but there were seats available. In fact, some of the seats on
the floor opened up Friday. They're selling for $93.50.
The show starts Saturday evening at 7:00, and Action News was told the Rolling
Stones will take the stage for at least two hours. And hey, it's only rock 'n'
roll, but I think you'll like it.
|
|
OCT. 6
|
Jagger Says First Stones Songs Were 'Crap'
LONDON (Reuters) - The first songs penned by Rolling Stones Mick Jagger and
Keith Richard were so sentimental they were ashamed of them, Jagger told BBC
Radio in an interview to be broadcast on Sunday.
"We couldn't write rock
songs. We just wrote these crap ballads," he told Britain's Radio Five
Live, in extracts of an interview that were released before Sunday's 1130 GMT
broadcast.
The band's first five hits were all cover versions of songs written by other
stars, though imbued with the Rolling Stones flavor.
But manager Andrew Loog Oldham wanted them to write their own material -- and
locked Jagger and Richard in a room until they did.
Jagger said the first song they produced, "As Tears Go By," was far
from the heavy-rocker image they were cultivating, so they gave it to pop singer
and Jagger girlfriend Marianne Faithfull (news),
who had a hit with it.
"It was pop and we didn't record it because it was crap," he said.
"We had a successful crap ballad...I can say now it's a wonderful tune, but
we didn't think it was that great at the time."
Jagger said he and Richard "were these two rebellious band members, and
we would write nice little tunes, but sentimental stuff."
The dynamic song-writing duo -- whose creative skill and tireless drive has
kept the band at the top of the notoriously fickle music business for four
decades -- finally hit their stride in 1965 with "The Last Time."
"Eventually we got to grips with writing rock tunes, but it took a
little time," Jagger said.
A string of hits followed, such as "Satisfaction," "Paint It
Black" and "Get Off Of My Cloud."
The group, which began as a rebellion band but has long since become absorbed
into the establishment, Jagger getting a knighthood earlier this year, has just
released 40 years of remastered greatest hits.
Richard said the band had no intention of slowing down after a lifetime in
the rock 'n' roll fast lane.
"Nobody has been scumbag rockers like us and lived to tell the tale. I
wouldn't put it past us to keep on rockin'," he said.
Jagger and Richard, who will both be 60 next year, are currently leading the
tireless Stones on another U.S. tour.
|
|
OCT. 8
|
|
Dissecting the sick demand for the
Stones
|
| Why far too many people
can't get enough Satisfaction |
by Ben Rayer The Star.com
|
| We have to write about the Rolling Stones.
Have to.
They don't need the press, of course. The Stones can count themselves
among those "elite" entertainment figures whose very existence
— births, deaths, marriages, affairs, divorces, addictions, real-estate
dealings, haircuts, knightings, quips about Elton John and his fondness
for dead blondes — is the stuff of daily headlines. So much ink has been
spilled on the crusty rockers, in fact, that finding a novel way to
acknowledge each new Rolling Stones tour that rolls into town (the "Licks"
extravaganza, arriving at the Air Canada Centre on Wednesday and SkyDome
on Friday) has become an unavoidable challenge of the music journalist's
profession. And here we go again. Good luck to me.
We have to write about the Rolling Stones because, to many, they are
and always will be the greatest rock 'n' roll band in the world. To ignore
them, to adopt a "no Stones" policy like local radio station
Edge 102's, would be letting down a large segment of the reading public a
newspaper purports to represent. People are deeply, religiously interested
in the Stones, and the press is hidebound to reflect that interest.
Still, if the Stones weren't so eager to remain on top with little
apparent concern for sustained artistic legitimacy, it would be a lot
easier for those of us who didn't grow up with the Jagger/Richards tandem
at the height of its powers to understand why so many seemingly rational
people lose their minds whenever one of these tours comes around. It
doesn't help that the global media machine — still controlled, largely,
by the first and second generations of Rolling Stones fans, whose
estimation of the group's contemporary relevance is tainted by
rose-coloured memories of its past greatness — is such a willing, mostly
uncritical partner in the band's ongoing self-mythologization.
Obviously, they became the world's most consistently adored, extant
rock band for a reason. And while the Rolling Stones are the most visible
punching bag for dinosaur rock, they are by no means the worst offenders
when it comes to cashing in on a legendary past. Four-fifths of the band's
1970s lineup is still intact, which is more than one can say for the
decidedly slender incarnations of the Who and the Doors that recently
passed through Toronto. They've at least occasionally gone through the
motions of writing new material (four songs on the 40 Licks double-CD
best-of set).
Judging by the opening "Licks" date at Boston's Fleet Centre
last month, they're also actually sounding a bit more on their game than
they did on their previous Bridges To Babylon tour in 1997. It's
particularly noted in the guitar department, where Keith Richards and
Ronnie Wood tumble together like they're sharing one mind. For a bunch of
60-ish cats with seven-, eight- and nine-figure bank accounts, they rock
far harder than they have to. Therein lies their enduring appeal, I
suppose.
The Stones' peak years set some untouchable standards for rock 'n' roll
songwriting, ranging from the bilious, post-adolescent rage of "Satisfaction"
to the scuzzed-up heroin blues of Sticky Fingers and Exile On
Main Street. The fact that there are probably two dozen Stones songs
that have been in perpetual, almost sadistic, radio rotation for
more than three decades says it all.
Beyond the music, though, the aura of druggy, dissolute menace and raw
sexuality the band exuded during the '60s and early '70s made it as
dangerous as Marilyn Manson or Slipknot in the eyes of delicate-natured
observers. The Rolling Stones were dangerous, positively punk-rock in
comparison to the Beatles, as well as hugely talented, and were therefore
natural candidates for a cross-cultural following at a time when rock was
still maturing as an art form and the competition for the public's
attention was small enough that one band really could captivate everyone
at once.
Before they became the ultimate touring oldies act, the Stones were the
embodiment of the "sex, drugs and rock `n' roll" ethos, the
template for a generation's ideal of rebellion. That kind of association
is hard to shake. So seeing the Rolling Stones (or Mick Jagger, at any
rate) onstage behaving like the past 40 years never happened, steaming
toward senior citizenship with diminished but defiant energy, is an oddly
encouraging experience.
For fans of the same, general age as the band, in particular, it's a
way of engaging with the past directly once every few years and pretending,
for 2.5 hours or so, that the mortgage and the kids and the paunch and the
bald spot and all the other things that make you feel old and out of touch
never happened. That's fine.
Just remember, Stones faithful, that there are other folks out there
with their own favourite bands, folks who get the same quickening in their
chests from old Eric's Trip and Love and Rockets albums that you get from Let
It Bleed. There are less of us than you, yes, but the experience is
exactly the same. And we get our backs up when the same respect isn't
extended to our tastes that everyone extends, willingly and with
very good reason, to the Rolling Stones. Enjoy the shows.
|
|
|
OCT 10
|
Keith
on the cover of Rolling Stone
Maybe this cover from Rolling Stone Magazine was a little too much for Rod
Stewart. At least he commented it the other day, and said, that Keith is almost
60 years, and should wear some more clothes.
|
|
OCT 18
|
New Rolling Stones Album Could Come Soon, Says Ron Wood
10/18/02, 3 p.m. ET) -- The Rolling Stones went into the studio in Paris,
France, earlier this year, ostensibly to record a few new songs for the Forty
Licks retrospective. The Stones wound up with more than two dozen new
compositions, four of which are included on Forty Licks.
That seems to indicate that a new studio album shouldn't be too far away, and
guitarist Ron Wood tells LAUNCH that the goods are there to turn something out
relatively quickly. "We went there, in Paris, to do six songs, and we ended
up doing 25. Like, we have another new album in the making, if you like, out of
the Paris sessions. I would say it wouldn't take more than a few months to do
the final vocals and mixing. There's not much needs doing to the basic
tracks--you know, maybe an overdub here and there--but if we were forced, we
could have it out in a couple of months."
Gary Graff, Detroit
|
|
OCT 13
|
Stones' first manager looks back
By Jane Stevenson, Toronto Sun
When Andrew Loog Oldham first set eyes on the Rolling Stones at an early 1963
gig, he described it as seeing "rock 'n' roll in 3-D and Cinerama for the
first time."
More specifically, he was referring to frontman Mick Jagger and guitarists
Brian Jones and Keith Richards. The quote was from his 2000 book, Stoned: A
Memoir Of London In the 1960s, spanning the years 1960-64.
"When I was promoting Stoned in England, I did this BBC show and they got
some old clips," the former Stones manager/producer said when he was here
in June as a guest speaker at the North By Northeast music conference.
"And they had a black-and-white BBC thing -- I think it was Top Of The
Pops -- of the Stones doing It's All Over Now, I think, or The Last
Time."
"Sexy. I mean, this boy, Mick Jagger, was like a snake on camomile tea."
The topic comes up because Oldham is asked about what he thinks of his former
charges playing stadiums now. After all, it was Oldham who, after being hired
by Brian Epstein at age 19 to be a press agent for the Beatles, discovered the
Stones at Station Hotel just outside London.
"When we last saw the Stones at Madison Square Garden, in '98, it didn't
particularly move me. On a level of, 'When did the hairs stand up on my hand
and when did I get a lump in my throat?' -- I can tell you it was seven songs
out of 29. But the public is a totally different matter."
Oldham and co-manager Eric Easton got the group a record deal with Decca. But
it was Oldham alone who fashioned the group's bad-boy image, in contrast to
the Beatles' clean-cut, innocent one. "Would you let your daughter marry
a Rolling Stone?" was Oldham's brilliant PR line that all the Brit media
picked up on. A similar line today might be, "Would you let your daughter
marry Eminem?"
In addition to his press manipulations, it was Oldham who demanded that Jagger
and Richards start writing their own songs, thereby alienating Jones. When
Oldham met the band, it was playing nothing but pure blues and R&B covers.
Oldham knew the band had to start writing its own hits, or soon it'd be all
over.
As the story goes, Oldham locked Jagger and Richards in their apartment
kitchen and wouldn't let them out until they'd written a song. By early 1964,
it was clear that the duo had talent in that area.
"The Rolling Stones made me have to take life seriously," Oldham
says. "Up until then, I was a press agent without a care in the world,
had no responsibilities, as long as I was getting the people in the press. I
wasn't having anybody calling me up at 3 o'clock in the morning."
Oldham had a famous and acrimonious falling out with the Stones a mere four
years later early on during the recording sessions for 1967's Their Satanic
Majesties Request. The band -- especially Mick and Keith -- felt it had
outgrown Oldham. The PR schtick wasn't working anymore, and he knew little
about producing records. One day in the studio, the Stones deliberately played
the blues so badly that Oldham got the hint and walked out for good.
But he doesn't seem bitter about being absent just as the band approached its
zenith, starting with 1968's Beggars Banquet.
"I had my period. We were our first marriage. Their next one was a
combination of themselves, (manager) Allen Klein, and (record producer) Jimmy
Miller," Oldham says. "I mean, I don't think I would find Truman
Capote on a plane in 1973 being ga-ga about the Rolling Stones that funny. But
it was part of the circus that the Rolling Stones could handle. It was just
part of, 'Oh this is the new workload. Okay, another bunch of idiots,' and get
on with it. You don't invite yourself to what you can't survive."
Oldham -- who has lived in Bogota, Columbia, since 1982 -- will deal with the
time leading up to that period in his next book, 2Stoned. It will cover the
years 1964-67 and was scheduled to hit book stores in North America next
spring.
Oldham currently doesn't have a relationship with any of the Stones, although
he still has enormous respect for them.
"The three of them who are still the Rolling Stones -- Mick, Keith and
Charlie (Watts). I don't really know Ronnie Wood. I have tremendous respect
for (former bassist) Bill Wyman. I saw him playing this casino in Connecticut
and then he was backstage at The Who concert (at Albert Hall in February). We
did something we never had done in 40 years: We had dinner together. That went
very well. It was a valuable time. It was good. I'm glad we did it."
Not that they need to do it again.
"We might have just crossed all the knots that we had to and we're both
the better off for it, and there's no need for a rematch."
And, if he were still managing the Stones today? He says if they can't make
albums that sell anymore, why not continue to tour?
"Actually, I kind of breathed a sigh of relief," Oldham says of his
reaction to news last spring the Stones would hit the road again.
"They've had their time off. What does a musician do? He plays. So now
they're doing it. It's actually pretty simple."
He doesn't have a lot of time for people who say the Stones should pack it in
now that the members are all in their late 50s and early 60s.
"It doesn't matter whether it's the Stones or The Who or The
Eagles," Oldham says. "When they're not working, that's when they
should pack it in. I mean, apart from when they put out solo records.
"You can't deny the audience. I mean, people are buying tickets at pretty
expensive prices -- $200-$300. I was in Connecticut three weeks ago, coming
out of this restaurant ... and these two guys come up in the parking lot, 'Loog!'
They showed me the tickets they'd just got for Philadelphia to see the Stones.
Empowered, impassioned, it's the most exciting thing that happened to them --
you know, they've got their tickets, they're set. So that's the answer to the
cynicism that goes around about (the Stones)."
Oldham also approved of the way the Stones announced their tour, via a blimp
ride in a Bronx park back in May. After all, it was vintage Oldham PR.
"I thought it was great because it's a Barnum & Bailey world, and I
talked to people from New York and they were going to me, 'Oh, what are they
going to next?' These are people who are on the periphery of the game but
they're not really soldiers. Whereas the Rolling Stones are soldiers."
|
|
OCT. 13
|
Start Me Up, Danny
By Tony Kornheiser
Saturday, October 12, 2002; Page D01
Some months back I was chatting with Dan Snyder (owner of the Washington
Redskins), making small talk about how the Redskins might do under new coach
Steve Spurrier. Snyder was very excited to have Spurrier.
And then he told me he was very excited about something else: His favorite band,
the Rolling Stones, was signed to play a concert at FedEx Field in October.
Snyder was ecstatic. "You like the Rolling Stones?" he asked me.
Do I like them? I named my son after Mick Jagger."
"Well, how'd you like to come to the pre-concert meal with the Stones?
They've got to eat something before they play. We can eat with them."
Ohmigod!
Oh, please this isn't another horribly self-indulgent Kornheiser column
about his life, is it? I hoped we were done with them when he left Style.
Come on, this is Sports!
You want sports? Wilbon will write another Redskins column in 24 hours.
Can you wait until then, or will you dry up and die from lack of in-depth
Patrick Ramsey coverage?
So anyway, months went by. I never heard from Snyder.
I figured he'd forgotten about me. Then last week on the morning of the
concert, he called and said, "Are you ready to meet Mick
Jagger?"
He explained he could bring four people to meet the Stones before the
concert. He had been allotted five minutes with them hardly a generous
gesture considering The Danny owns FedEx Field.
"What about their pregame meal?" I asked.
"Apparently they don't eat a pregame meal," Snyder said.
"Have you seen them?" I said. "It doesn't look like they've eaten
any meals since 1973."
I spent the rest of the day itching like a man on a fuzzy tree, as The King
would say. The easy part was writing a check to charity for the tickets. The
hard part was thinking what to say to Jagger, whom I'd revered for 40
years. I wanted desperately to say something smart and witty that would give him
a good impression of me. Here's what I
came up with:
"So, Mick, how many women have you slept with so far?"
(The correct answer is: "So far today?")
I actually met Mick once before, at the Meadowlands about 25 years ago.
Well, maybe "met" is a reach. I was covering Pele's last game
with the Cosmos in the old North American Soccer League.
After the game I was in the locker room, trying to get as close to Pele as
possible. I was about 10 feet from him, in a crush of reporters, straining to
make out what Pele was saying. From behind, somebody kept pushing and
shoving me, and the jostling was hampering me from
taking notes. So I wheeled, ready to tell this guy if he shoved me again I'd
deck him . . . when I realized the guy was Mick Jagger! He was the last person
on Earth I expected to see there. I have no idea why he was there, but I
couldn't punch Mick Jagger. So I babbled something idiotic about how
much I loved his music, and I turned back to Pele.
But now, 25 years later, I couldn't tell Mick that story. It would take too
long. It came to no point. And there was a good chance Mick didn't
remember any of the '70s, let alone this one soccer game.
Snyder was as nervous about meeting the Stones as I was. He had made Redskins
jerseys for them, each individualized with their names. He had helmets to
give them, inscribed "Hail to the Redskins" and "Hail to the
Stones."
"What are you going to say when you meet them?" I asked.
"I don't know," Snyder said. "That's why you're here. You're the
writer."
"Hey, this is casual conversation, not 'Moby Dick.' We were told to
be in the stadium tunnel by 7:30, almost two hours before the Stones would
actually perform. (One of the Stones' handlers met us and said, "Wait
here. We'll bring the talent to you."
Very edgy.) I stood there like a dope, holding a couple of helmets. I was
completely
panicked. Snyder was counting on me to say something that would break the ice.
All I had was, "So, you guys taken any good drugs in the last
hour?"
What Snyder wanted most was a photograph of him with the Stones. To that end he
brought a photographer with him. (Oh, like you wouldn't?) I
understood completely. I was prepared to jump through fire to be in the
shot.
Suddenly they were in front of us. Ron Wood and Keith Richards, slouching
and laughing conspiratorially. Charlie Watts, thin as a reed. And finally Mick.
I wasn't so much struck by how old they appeared, as how miniature.
Jagger was the biggest and he fits in the glove compartment. The
most any of them can weigh is 130. They seemed somnambulant. I had the
sense that behind their guitars, the second most important piece of
equipment the Stones traveled with was a respirator. (Later they put on such a
great, energetic show that it was impossible to believe these were the same
people. We must have caught them in a cocooning period.)
I tried to engage Keith in conversation. I mentioned a "60 Minutes
II" piece I'd seen on the Stones. I told Keith he came across by far the
best. He appeared to smile at me, and some sort of sound came from his mouth
that reminded me of what you get when you tape record dolphins. I was sure
Keith and I could be great friends if only we could
find a common language. (I don't know if this comes across in videos, but
Keith actually has fish hooks and sinkers tied to his hair. I didn't know
whether to chat him up or weigh him!)
I handed a helmet to Watts, who seemed concerned.
"They wear these, don't they?" he asked me.
"Yes."
"Well, if we have them, what will they wear?"
"Don't worry," I assured him. "They have others. They won't go
out on the field bare-headed."
This seemed to mollify him. To my right Snyder and his wife Tanya were talking
to Mick. Tanya had brought a magazine with Mick on the cover, and she'd
asked him to autograph it.
"To Dan," she said.
"How do you spell Dan?" Mick asked. Sort of stops you cold, doesn't
it?
"To, T-O, Dan, D-A-N," Tanya said. I leaned my head over. Snyder
introduced me as
> someone on ESPN. For all Mick knew I could have been the night
manager at Burger King. "I don't watch much ESPN," Jagger said.
"Unless they have soccer on."
This, of course, would have been a perfect opening for me to tell the Pele
story. Instead I opted for this gem: "It's an honor to meet you. I'm sure
you hear this all the time, but I named my son after you."
Jagger regarded me warily. "That is so weird," he said. And
quickly brushed by me.
(He hears it all the time? Gaaack! He probably only hears that when
somebody hits him with a paternity suit.)
That's it? That's your big moment with Mick Jagger?
What a stooge you must have felt like.
Uh, yeah.
But we were all thrilled at actually meeting the Stones and shaking their hands.
I never expected to do that in my life. We were bouncing with joy.
Snyder told me the "To Dan" story, and I told him the helmet story.
"That was great, wasn't it?" he said. "Meeting the Rolling
Stones!"
"Yeah, congratulations. And to think it only cost you $800
million."
|
|
OCT. 19
|
Wood art a rock show
Stones guitarist plies a mean brush
By BRETT CLARKSON
If there was an instruction manual explaining how to become a credible,
successful, and respected visual artist it would probably say: Do not already be
a successful musician.
There's likely no quicker way of drawing the suspicion of critics, whose eyes
are almost guaranteed to glaze over at the thought of yet another rock star
picking up a paint brush.
But then there's Rolling Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood. When he's not touring,
chances are you'll find him in the attic of his Irish castle at Sandymount
quietly toiling away at what's become a respectable -- and financially sound --
collection of rock-'n-roll portraiture. For example, if you wanted to buy one of
the three Ronnie Wood original works here in Toronto -- not a reproduced screen
print or serigraph -- you're looking at upwards of $33,600.
Speaking of Toronto, Wood's first Canadian exhibition opened this week at Klim
Art Galleries (2473 Yonge St., just north of Eglinton Ave.).
It was a packed wine-and-cheese affair with throngs of people bumping into each
other and trying not to look like they were craning their necks at the door --
instead of the more than 40 pieces on the wall.
Wood himself didn't show up. Even after the gallery had purchased the requisite
Wood beverage of choice, cranberry juice, he was a no-show.
As for his art, Wood generally sticks to rock-'n'-roll royalty, which is
appropriate, given his Stones status. As writers are told to write what they
know, Wood clearly paints and draws what he knows.
As well, he's obviously allowed a level of intimacy and accessibility that other
chroniclers of pop icons would be hard-pressed to ever enjoy.
Perhaps Wood would do better to explore this intimacy. Most of the pieces show
Mick singing, Keith strumming, etc., which you'll see anywhere. What about Mick
brushing his teeth? Or Keith (if he wears any) applying deodorant? Now, that
would be gold.
Now, it's obvious the work itself is technically competent. Simply put, the guy
can draw. He elegantly captures Stones drummer Charlie Watts in a $3,750 print
called "Charlie (Voodoo)," which has Watts behind the kit, his face
clenched in a moment of determined yet restrained ferocity. This is classic
Charlie, and Wood obviously has a keen eye for choosing those moments which
perfectly capture a person's entire character.
Then there's the fabulous and Andy Warhol-like Bob Dylan portrait (framed
$1,890), which alludes to Wood's considerable talent as a colourist. Not to
mention the haunting study of world-weary bluesman Eric Clapton that deftly
combines swaths of darkness with an illuminating radiance from Clapton's sad
face.
That said, Ronnie Wood isn't a particularly important or groundbreaking artist,
but he likely never set out to be. Which is fine.
His work doesn't push boundaries or illicit a philosophical dialogue or inspire
all that much, but who cares? This is decorative art, which was obviously
created not to incite riots or offer commentary. But instead it's the kind of
art you'd put on your walls to make your house more of a home. And there's
nothing wrong with that.
However, you have to wonder if Ronnie wasn't a Stone, would he be showing in New
York, Cleveland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Las Vegas and Toronto over
the next few weeks?
Or better yet, you'd also have to wonder about the market -- would a Wood
original still have a $33,600 price tag?
Then again, you're not really paying for the art. You're paying for a bit of
Ronnie Wood, the Rolling Stone. Admit it.
The show runs until Oct. 31.
|
|
OCT. 21
|
Rules are made to be bent
From globeandmail.com, Monday, October 21, 2002
DAVID MACFARLANE
Departing briefly from what must surely be the most tedious question
in the entertainment world (are the Rolling Stones too old, yawn, to play
rock 'n' roll?), I thought I might instead address the subject of
generosity.
However, I do so with the Rolling Stones in mind. We went to see them a
few nights ago.
(Sound of furiously flipping pages, as my 25-to-35-year-old readers -- all
seven of them -- head for the hills.)
And whatever critical debates anyone might have about the show, and
whether you love, hate, or are indifferent to their music, there is one
uncontestable fact about the Rolling Stones that I would like to draw to
the attention of anyone still with me. They are extremely generous
performers.
They play long, carefully-put-together sets. They choose their songs, and
the order of their songs, with evident care. The technology of their
concerts -- the sound, the lights, the big-screen, show-biz razzmatazz --
is slick and professional and designed to ensure that everyone, whether
their tickets cost $300 or $50, feels that they are in good seats. On this
tour, the band uses two stages -- one, arena-sized but blessedly simple;
the other, a smaller, even more simple bar-band setup that rises from the
back of the arena floor about two-thirds of the way through the show and
that suddenly makes many not-so-great seats very good indeed.
More importantly though, the Rolling Stones throw themselves into their
concerts with enthusiasm. Indeed, so enthusiastic was Keith Richard's
throwing of himself onto the stage the other night, the indomitable
guitarist went telecaster over tea-kettle before the band was past the
first bars of the opening song. Still, he came up from being down with a
smile and with a certain wobbly but undeniable panache -- as seems to be
our Keith's wont.
Perhaps their camaraderie and their apparent delight in still being
together after all these years is an illusion. Maybe they really hate one
another, can hardly wait to get back to the hotel, are bored stiff, and
are laughing all the way to their banks. But I doubt it, frankly. They
play too well and appear to be having too much fun doing so to be merely
pretending. They have discovered -- and, after the 40 years of playing, it
is hardly surprising that they have -- how to combine being well-rehearsed
with being exciting.
They know how to entertain, and their secret is simple: in sharing with us
the obvious enjoyment they take in their music, they give their audience
more than they are strictly required to give.
They don't have to work as hard as they do. They don't have to appear to
be having so much fun. They don't have to begin the show at 9:30 and take
their bows after midnight. They don't have to because, frankly, their most
devoted fans would cheer themselves hoarse if the band mailed the show in.
But the fact is, the Stones are gloriously generous entertainers. It's as
if they've decided that if they're going to go to the trouble of putting
on a show, they're not going to be skimpy about it.
Likely, the Rolling Stones are on my mind because my ears are still
ringing with them. Possibly, though, their generosity of performance is a
subject I want to raise because being generous seems a quality more
observed in its breach these days. I don't think this is because Canadians
are particularly selfish. I think it has to do with the fact that too many
are sticklers when it comes to rules.
After all, generosity is a characteristic that has to do with bending
rules -- which may be why the Rolling Stones are so good at it. Generosity
has to do with deciding to give excessively if one so chooses, for no
reason other than wanting to. Rules, on the other hand, frequently address
themselves to bureaucratic efficiency and to the minimum requirement. They
are the strictly measured shot glasses of behaviour.
A few nights before my wife and I attended the Stones concert, my
more-extended family went to a fine restaurant near Niagara-on-the-Lake,
Ont., for a Thanksgiving dinner. We made reservations for 10, but when we
arrived -- due to an inexplicable miscalculation about how many people are
in our family -- there turned out to be 11 of us.
No big deal you would imagine. But then you wouldn't be the pretty,
smartly put-together, but humourless hostess we ran up against. She
informed us coolly that 10 was the most that could be accommodated at a
table. We assured her we did not mind crowding in. We said we would prefer
to all sit together -- as families like to do at Thanksgiving.
She did not return our smiles. So we cajoled, we pleaded. But she would
not be budged. So a few of us began to get huffy. Which only made things
worse. Rules were rules, she said. And so, on a busy weekend night, with
nowhere else to go, we sat at two tables.
I have been doing my best to forget about her. Life's too short. And
anyway, the food and the wine were excellent, as was our friendly waitress,
and we all enjoyed ourselves in spite of the pickle our hostess apparently
sat on during her formative years. But she popped back into mind the other
night as the audience filed from the Air Canada Centre after the concert,
and I noticed how many people were smiling. Generosity has that effect.
And it occurred to me that pretty, smartly put-together, humourless types
who have not yet learned so important a truth about being human might do
well to spend some time in the company of the Rolling Stones. I'm sure
Keith could teach her a thing or two.
|
|
OCT. 25
|
Hear Chuck Leavell's NPR radio
interview
plus his own version of Tumbling Dice, as well as some jams with slide
guitarist Roy Rogers (taped
Friday October 25)
|
|
OCT. 25
|
Rolling Stones sideman sues Nashville dentist
B y CHRISTIAN BOTTORFF,
Staff Writer
A Nashville tenor saxophonist who has played with the Rolling Stones for
decades has accused a Nashville dentist of performing a faulty procedure that is
keeping the musician off the band's tour and is otherwise damaging his music
career.
Bobby Keys, known for his work on popular albums such as the Stones' Exile on
Main Street and Sticky Fingers, blames caps that will not stay on his teeth for
keeping him off the tour. The caps also kept him from playing on the Rolling
Stones' latest release, the suit states.
His malpractice suit, which is seeking an unspecified amount of compensatory
and punitive damages, was filed yesterday in Davidson County Circuit Court.
Attempts to reach Keys and his attorneys were unsuccessful yesterday.
The dentist identified in the suit, H. Larry Grissom, said in a telephone
interview yesterday that Keys' teeth were in poor shape when he started seeing
the saxophonist as a patient. Grissom said he started working on Keys' teeth a
year ago to correct what another dentist had done.
''It was a mess,'' said Grissom, whose practice is on 21st Avenue South.
''Once I got all the old stuff out, then we had problems from there.''
The procedure was done around August of last year, Keys' suit states.
Grissom said he had not seen the suit and will be reviewing it with a lawyer.
In his lawsuit, Keys said faulty procedures caused him to lose ''thousands of
dollars'' and threatened his career. Keys receives $5,000 per appearance,
according to his suit.
The Rolling Stones have been on tour in the United States since early last
month. They play in Atlanta this weekend and are scheduled for a Nov. 25 show at
the Gaylord Entertainment Center.
A Toronto dentist told Keys that Grissom ''ground away too much material,
leaving stumps that were too small to hold the crowns in a stable condition,''
the lawsuit states.
Grissom, in yesterday's interview, also raised questions about whether Keys
was biting too hard on a piece stuck on the end of his instrument, called a
setup, which causes saxophones to make noise.
Keys had a history of similar dental procedures, Grissom said. Keys' teeth
were breaking off and falling out, Grissom said. One tooth even had to be
removed, Grissom said. The old dental work had to be taken out, he said.
Keys' suit said Grissom is ''negligent'' in that he ''repeatedly assured Keys
that the procedure was routine, that (Grissom) had performed the procedure on
numerous occasions and that there was no risk…'' it would keep Keys from
working as a professional sax player.
Keys has been playing saxophone since the 1950s, with artists such as Buddy
Holly, Sheryl Crow and B.B. King, according to the allmusic.com Web site.
|
|
OCT. 26
|
The Stones Age
After 40 years of rocking, Mick Jagger and company
are still rolling
By Craig Seymour, Atlanta Journal
Oct. 26, 1981: The Rolling Stones, the beloved
bad boys of rock, are playing the Fox Theatre. And tickets are hotter than Mount
St. Helens. The tour -- sponsored by the makers of Jovan Musk -- is in support
of their hit album, "Tattoo You," featuring the vigorous jolter of a
single "Start Me Up."
It's also a must-see gig because you never know when the Stones are going to
pack it in. A month before, the group's 38-year-old frontman, Mick Jagger, told
a reporter, "I can't carry on doing the kind of act I'm doing now
forever."
Tickets for the show are distributed in a bizarre early-morning sale at the
Atlanta Civic Center the Wednesday before. At about 2:30 a.m., local radio
stations announce that tickets are available. Shortly thereafter, all 3,900 are
gone, even though they're priced at a whopping $16.50.
John Goss, a senior at Briarcliff High School in DeKalb County, is lucky that
day. He was sound asleep during the sale, but a buddy, a Georgia Tech freshman,
gets tickets for both of them.
Others aren't so fortunate. Two guys are found hiding in a Fox air
conditioning duct in an attempt to sneak in. And some fans pay scalpers upwards
of $150 per ticket. Watching the two-hour performance, Goss can't wait to tell
friends about it. The Stones are the most popular band at his school. In the
yearbook, there's even a picture of Jagger strumming a guitar. The caption:
"Never too old to rock and roll."

Louis Lanzao AP
"My job is simply to go out there and do the best show I can," says
Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger.
'Living in the present'
October 2002. Mick Jagger is on the phone from Toronto, trying his best to
explain the Stones' continued appeal. He's polite, but notably irritated by
these questions. Perhaps it's because he's been answering them for nearly 40
years.
On Saturday -- 21 years to the day after the Fox show -- Jagger and the boys
return to Atlanta as part of their worldwide "Licks" tour. This time,
ticket prices range from $53 to $303. And the tour is sponsored not by drugstore
toilet water but by the relatively tony online brokerage ETrade. (If you open an
ETrade account with at least $250,000, you get an attache case, two concert
tickets, a tour shirt, a framed picture and a paperweight. What a bargain!)
The jaunt is named after the new two-CD greatest-hits package "Forty
Licks," which commemorates the four decades since the group's first gig. On
July 12, 1962, Jagger, Keith Richards, Brian Jones and some long-gone other
members gave their first public performance at London's Marquee Club. Within a
year, they had added bassist Bill Wyman and drummer Charlie Watts, completing
the original outfit. In 1969, Mick Taylor signed on following the death of
Jones. When Taylor left in the mid-'70s, current guitarist Ron Wood took his
slot. Wyman retired from the band following its 1989 tour.
For 40 years, the group has shown a genius for synthesizing a wide array of
influences and sounds, from blues to reggae to trippy psychedelica and even
sex-soaked disco. The surly, streamlined guitar riffs of songs like "(I
Can't Get No) Satisfaction" and "Start Me Up" have come to define
the classic hard-rock sound.
Since the Fox show in 1981, the Stones have received a host of awards and
accolades. They've been inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and Jagger
was even knighted earlier this year.
But these days, the 59-year-old mouthpiece has no desire to relive former
glories. "I'm really not a very reverential person about my own past,"
Jagger says. "I'm not like an old football player talking about the goals I
scored 20 years ago. That's not what I do. I don't sit around talking about the
Rolling Stones tour of 1972. I like living in the present. I have fond memories
of the past, but I like to live now."
He claims that he's not terribly self-conscious about the band's enormous,
stadium-packing appeal. "It's not particularly interesting to overanalyze
it," Jagger says. "My job is simply to go out there and do the best
show I can and not wonder 'why' all the time. I'm not that introspective about
it."
He even gets a little testy at the suggestion that fans come to a Stones show
seeking a bit of nostalgia. "You don't come for one thing when you come to
a concert," he responds, his words picking up a good clip. "You go for
lots of things. You want to have a great time. You went to enjoy yourself with
friends. You want to get drunk. You want to get stoned out of your mind. I don't
think they all come to relive an experience, because what you're really doing is
having a new experience."
Jagger's caginess in discussing the Stones' appeal seems all the more notable
because he is openly acknowledged as the group's business mastermind. Any good
marketer -- and Jagger, who once attended the London School of Economics, is an
excellent one -- must stay closely in touch with the customers' desires.
He says the fans are drawn mostly to the music. And that may be true. But few
people will pay $300 just to hear a good batch of songs. There must be more to
it.
Markers in time
Lowell Brown, 51, of Athens saw the Stones at Auburn University on Nov. 14,
1969. It was less than a month before the group's infamous free show at the
Altamont Speedway in California, where an audience member was stabbed to death,
effectively ending the lighthearted hippie era.
Brown remembers the Auburn show well. Chuck Berry opened. Jagger "had on
some tight pants, dancing all around," he says. And Richards played a clear
acrylic guitar.
Brown never imagined then that the Stones would still be around now. "I
figured they'd be long gone."
In many ways, the fact that the Stones are still around is the group's
biggest appeal. While most of their contemporary musical groups have disbanded,
lost a debilitating number of key members or simply failed to sustain public
interest, the Stones have proved remarkably and quite unexpectedly stable given
their early reputation for tempting fate.
Jones, of course, was found dead in a swimming pool in 1969. And most of the
members have at one time nursed serious drug addictions. But because of the
band's inexplicable longevity, people of many ages are able to use Stones songs
as markers for times in their lives.
Keith Cumming, 49, of Cumming was 10 when he first heard the Stones'
"Not Fade Away." "I liked the blues edge," he says. "It
was different. Now that I've heard a lot of blues songs, I realize that they
were just copying riffs from Howlin' Wolf and Muddy Waters. But at that time in
the early '60s, rock was mostly about the Beatles' and Beach Boys' simple
harmonies. You really didn't hear the blues on white radio stations very
much."
Two years later, Cumming bought the "Satisfaction" single for 39
cents at a store in downtown Cleveland. And in the pre-Ticketmaster era of 1972,
he camped out to get tickets for a pair of back-to-back Stones shows in Toronto.
"My ears are still damaged from that double-header," he says.
In 1998, Cumming and his wife, Donna, saw the Stones from the fifth row at
Madison Square Garden. They had bonded over the group while dating. His favorite
Stones song is "Gimme Shelter"; hers is "Monkey Man."
"Sometimes on the weekends, when it's just the two of us, we'll play
Stones songs until 2 or 3 in the morning," he says.
He says he'll always love the band because of those memories. Going to a
Stones show is both pleasant flashback and sign of endurance. It's like the high
school sweatshirt that somehow still fits.
"I don't think any of us wants to let go of our youth," Cumming
says. "I have great memories and so many great times attending
concerts."
"It's comforting to know that what you've enjoyed in the past is still
there to enjoy," says Goss, who'll be at Turner Field on Saturday.
In other words, you're never too old to rock and roll.
|
|
OCT. 26
|
AS CONGRESS BICKERS, FORESTS BURN
Chuck Leavell
-----------------------------------------------------------
Mother Nature is finally doing what Congress was unable to
do this session, putting out wildfires that have burned in
all 50 states, destroying nearly 7 million acres of national
forests.
The snowfalls that now are mercifully extinguishing the
fires contrast starkly with the icy chill President Bush's
Healthy Forest Initiative received on Capitol Hill, where it
has been stalled for months by partisan bickering.
And, while Congress squabbled, the forests burned.
When the issue is forests, the debate in Washington has
become all-too-predictable. Each side trots out the same old
arguments and the same old advocates, and the result too
often is gridlock. But, as America's 10 million family
forest owners know well - if you want to keep your forests
healthy and growing, doing nothing in the face of massive
threats just isn't an option.
This year seemed to mark a turning point. Mr. Bush
introduced a sensible, scientifically sound plan for
preventing the devastation caused by unchecked wildfires on
federal forests. Then, for a hopeful moment, both sides
reached across party lines to find a compromise.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, South Dakota Democrat,
took the first risk by inserting language into a spending
bill to exempt federal rules and allow a timber sale to
proceed in his home state. He understood that years of
suppressing wildfires had set the stage for catastrophic
fires in the future.
Sen. Larry E. Craig, Idaho Republican, and Sen. Dianne
Feinstein, California Democrat, then worked together to pass
similar reforms in the Senate, while Rep. Scott McInnis,
Colorado Republican, and Rep. George Miller, California
Democrat, are still trying to reach a solution in the House.
Taking the stand that careful harvesting can actually be
good for forest management was an important step for
Democrats this year. Mr. Miller and Rep. Peter DeFazio,
Oregon Democrat, made it clear to green groups during House
hearings that they believe it is time to actively manage
forests, and they have negotiated in good faith with
Republicans to find a solution.
But as time runs out, it becomes clear this is a battle
that must be carried over into the 108th session of
Congress.
The summer of 2002 was the second-largest fire season in
the last 50 years. More than 67,000 wildfires scorched the
earth. But few of those fires devastated family owned
forests. Why? Because, like my wife Rose Lane and me, most
family forest owners know the best stewards must be part of
the environmental equation. We actively manage our forests
by thinning, removing fuel buildup and performing carefully
prescribed burns every few years so we can prevent the kind
of disastrous wildfires we've seen this year on federal
forests.
We're very proud of the stewardship at our family forest,
Charlane Plantation. We do a lot of the work ourselves, and
over the years we've made it a much better place, with
bountiful wildlife and healthy watersheds, and we're working
hard to make it even better. I believe our national forests
would be far healthier if they were managed like our
family-owned forest.
The great pioneers that established the national forest
system, Theodore Roosevelt, Gifford Pinchot and others, knew
long ago how important good stewardship is, and that it just
doesn't happen - you have to work at it. Our forests belong
to all Americans, and while trees cannot vote or send in
campaign donations, they deserve protection through
intelligent and active management, not by fencing them off
to human activity and watching them burn.
Sadly, this year's congressional session answered the
age-old question: Millions of trees fell in the forests, and
Congress did not hear the sound.
Chuck Leavell is an award-winning tree farmer and
world-renowned pianist currently touring with the Rolling
Stones. He is author of a book on American forests called
"Forever Green."
|
|
OCT. 26
|
STONE GOLD
What gets creaky rollers up out of their rockers? A
lucrative tour of the world
BY EVELYN McDONNELL
Imagine you're a secondary member of one of the most storied bands in
contemporary music history, a band with, improbably, the longest shelf life of
all the great acts of rock's golden era (a longevity that's perhaps testament to
the preservative effects of pickling?). You've made a career of being a
secondary player in Great Bands. It's a nice life, an easy life; you paint in
your (copious) spare time, invest in clubs and whatnot. You never have to work
again.
But nonetheless, for reasons that are inscrutable even to yourself, every few
years, you haul yourself out of your English estate and traipse around the
world, flogging your craft. Is it for the money? The women? The parties? The
prestige? The power? Could it even be for the music? And when that call comes,
how exactly does it come?
''You get wind from the main office that the boys are interested in gathering
again,'' Ron Wood says mysteriously. ``We have a meeting, see what we could do.
And then, it starts to materialize.''
He could be talking about some secret society or clandestine government
operation. Instead, of course, the 55-year-old guitarist is talking about the
Rolling Stones. Their Forty Licks tour brings the rock 'n' roll
institution to the Office Depot Center in Sunrise Tuesday and AmericanAirlines
Arena Wednesday.
This year, the Stones have fewer reasons to tour than most. For one, the
economy has tanked; it's not a great time to be asking people to pay hundreds of
dollars to hear songs that aren't exactly as fresh as a Missy Elliott remix. The
Stones don't even have a new album. Instead, they are peddling Forty Licks,
a retrospective of their career that includes early material and four new songs.
''Normally we tour to promote an album,'' Wood says, speaking over the phone
from New York. ``Instead, we're doing a whole cross section of new and old.''
And then, of course, there's the issue of how do they top their own act.
Their past three tours were not mere tours: They were strategic, coordinated
international invasions scoring the kind of epic cash haul that could help Bono
feed Africa, or at least keep Mick Jagger and Keith Richards off the road for
another few years. The Stones' 1989 Steel Wheels tour set a then
rock-tour record by raking in $260 million, according to a recent Fortune
magazine feature on the Stones. The Voodoo Lounge tour brought almost
$370 million, Bridges to Babylon/No Security $390 million.
''We didn't go out for that on this one,'' Wood says. ``We just came out
musically, to get it honed down. It's totally different from any Stones tour
I've done before. It's much more of a concentrated effort. Musically the band
got so much better. All the back line, with the brass sections and the
background singers: Everyone is really shining.''
But many music lovers scoff at the aging Brits trotting out their wares one
more time. Old-time Stones fans like Noel Gallagher of the band Oasis consider
the band's recent doings, including Jagger being knighted by the Queen of
England, a complete betrayal.
''Haven't they gotten enough money?'' Gallagher said in a recent interview.
``They were supposed to be the rebels. It's a betrayal of everything they stand
for. They should be called the Rolling Thrones.
``They're the greatest rock band there ever was. But at the point they start
playing [expletive] whatever, will you be buying a hamburger? Because I know I
will. When you go to see the Rolling Stones, you want to hear all the classics.
After Steel Wheels, it's all about money. And it's wrong.''
The Stones say this tour is different, that the focus is back on making
music. The first decision the Stones made on past tours was whether to play
stadiums, arenas, or clubs. For Licks, they opted to play all three. That
means that instead of setting up the same stage show every night, every night is
different. The idea is to make a Stones show a musical concert, not a theatrical
production.
Stripping away the accouterments and making ''the music'' the point of a
production is not exactly an original idea. That's why Madonna called her last
album Music, after all. In 2001, U2 decided to follow a decade in which
their stage shows had gotten bigger, glossier, and clunkier with a lean,
music-centric production. The resulting Elevation tour was a huge
critical and commercial success. One can imagine former London School of
Economics student Jagger poring over U2's tour reports with a gleam in his eye.
No one has ever charged the Stones, recyclers of Muddy Waters hooks, with excess
originality.
If not inventive, the Stones' ''music'' line may at least be genuine. The
group (Jagger, Richards, Wood and drummer Charlie Watts, joined by bassist
Darryl Jones) rehearsed a whopping 140 songs to prepare for this tour, preparing
a retrospective repertoire that allows them to change up to 10 songs on the set
list every show. The night before each gig, the band faxes each other in their
hotel rooms, or Wood and Jagger go to Richards' room. They come up with a set
list; if someone doesn't want to play a particular song, ``it's back to the
drawing board.''
The night of the show, the band rehearses at every sound check -- not
something a band that has played together approximately two million times
necessarily bothers to do.
''A lot of it is a surprise to us as well as it is to the audience, by the
time we get to the final set list we're using that night,'' Wood says. ``That
keeps the interest going. The set lists are quite challenging. It keeps you on
your toes. You may find an emphasis one night on Exile on Main Street,
then another night maybe a Some Girls night, or a Black and Blue night.
Then we're mixing in reggae, soul, blues evenings. Different mixtures. The
audiences are loving it, like we all are. We've raised the bar with playing,
with music.''
The Stones have changed in other ways: Wood, for one, has sworn off drugs and
alcohol for the past seven months.
``I have to change my whole angle. Luckily it's not been that hard. I've
fallen off the wagon a couple times, that's understandable. I'm back on the
program now. It's doing me good. I'm getting a lot of response and support from
the band, and from the audience. I'm still a nut case, still as nuts as when I
was using. But somehow I get rounded and I don't need to celebrate.''
What Wood calls ''my new viewpoint on life'' has helped his musicianship.
''We're seeing things a bit clearer; I know I am,'' Wood says. ``My playing
has come on a lot better for it. I'm playing the best that I've ever played.''
Most reviews back Wood up. The Boston Herald praised the show's ''scruffy
charm'' and ''high-octane, full-tilt fervency.'' ''The Stones defy time and
derision by pleasing themselves first,'' Jon Pareles wrote in The New York
Times.
Still, many observers are skeptical at the prospect of another Stones tour.
Neal Pollack, also writing in The New York Times, said ''they are a Vegas
headliner show, not a rock outfit.'' Author John Strausbaugh has called them
``the historical reenactment of the once-great Rolling Stones.''
Many people felt the rest of the band should have followed original Rolling
Stones bassist Bill Wyman when he called it quits in '92 because he said 30
years was enough. Erstwhile ''street-fighting man'' Jagger was recently made a
knight, a capitulation to authority that even Richards has scoffed at. The band
has been accused of becoming mercenaries. Tickets for the current tour are as
high as $350 (although the $50 tickets for the club gigs are a bargain -- and
retailing on the Internet for thousands).
''We just try to make it as fair as possible so we can make a profit and
they're not breaking their backs to buy a ticket,'' Wood says.
Wood says the current tour could change skeptics' minds.
``It's surprised me how reviews have been so good. I'm sure they're not just
kissing our a--. I think they've really enjoyed what they've heard. Once they've
seen the show, they completely change their mind.''
Perhaps the best proof of the Stones' renewed musical intentions is Wood's
carefree attitude when it's pointed out that it might be a good thing the Stones
are touring to play music, not set sales records, given the fact that neither
South Florida appearance has sold out.
``That's cool, Wood laughs. ``That'll teach us a lesson.''
|
|
OCT. 29
|
Rolling Stones Do Hoops
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Rolling Stone Mick Jagger, a keen hoops
player in his youth, has become the newest recruit to the National
Basketball Association.
The veteran English rock band has joined forces with the NBA for a
promotional campaign that will air throughout the league's season, which
begins on Tuesday, both parties said on Monday.
A 30-second ``Love It Live'' TV spot mixing footage from the Stones'
current North American tour with game action highlights, will debut on
Tuesday when the Philadelphia 76ers play the Orlando Magic and the San
Antonio Spurs take on defending champions the Los Angeles Lakers.
The ad will depict the group performing its new single ``Don't
Stop,'' which is taken from its compilation album ``Forty Licks.''
NBA stars featured in the ad include Jason Kidd, Shaquille O'Neal,
and Kevin Garnett, a statement said.
Jagger's father, a retired sports professor, helped make basketball
popular in Britain, and he coached his son's high school team.
His bandmates, guitarists Keith Richards and Ron Wood, are better
known for their prowess at the snooker table.
|
|
OCT. 30
|
Keith Richards called a 'mama's boy'
SANTA MONICA, Calif. (AP) -- It may be hard to believe, but
hard-rocking Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards was a mama's boy. And
drummer Charlie Watts banjo playing lead him to the drums.
Former Rolling Stones bassist Bill Wyman reveals these things in his upcoming
book, "Rolling With the Stones."
Wyman, who left the supergroup in 1997 to become a solo artist, said Richards'
mother said Keith always clung to her.
"His mother always said he was a bit of a mama's boy," Wyman
revealed. "He used to cry a lot and be frightened of being left at school
and all. But that's because he's an only child."
Wyman also said since Richards is an only child he definitely likes to have
his way.
"Single kids do get spoiled a bit more than kids with brothers and
sisters, so I supposed that's why he likes his own way and ....that's why he
can be a bit bullyish sometimes."
And Wyman said drummer Charlie Watts was a creative child, or else the world
may not have seen him as a great drummer.
Wyman said Watts wanted to play banjo as a boy but couldn't get the hang of
it. Watts was an enterprising sort, so he took apart the banjo and made
himself a drum. Wyman said the idea paid off.
"It obviously paid him well because Watts turned out to be a great
drummer, rather than a great banjoist, thank the Lord," Wyman quipped.
"If Watts had been a great banjo player, he never would have been in the
band now would he?"
Wyman knows these intimate details because he pretty much grew up with
Richards, Watts and lead singer Mick Jagger and guitarist Ronnie Wood when he
joined The Rolling Stones in 1962. He experienced the band growth from just
some band from England into its legendary status as one of the world's
greatest rock bands of all time.
|
|
OCT 29.
|
Ron Wood Says The Rolling Stones Are Braced For Bill Wyman's New Book
(10/29/02, 7 a.m. ET) -- There's been no shortage of Rolling Stones books,
tawdry and otherwise, released throughout the group's 40-year history. Guitarist
Ron Wood tells LAUNCH that the band, currently on its Licks tour of North
America, isn't expecting too many embarrassing revelations from the latest
entry--the just-published Rolling With The Stones, a lavish coffee-table-sized
book co-authored by former Stones bassist Bill Wyman. "No, I think it's a
bit too late for that. No, I've seen excerpts in magazines. I mean, we all have
a laugh when we see what could be in store."
The 496-page Rolling With The Stones--which features more than 3,000 photos,
many of which were taken by Wyman himself--is the second Stones book from the
bassist, who left the band in 1992. His previous offering, Stone Alone, was a
more personal memoir that covered his life and the Stones' career until 19 | | |